Epistemic values in feature importance methods: Lessons from feminist epistemology
By Leif Hancox-Li, Indra Elizabeth Kumar. 2021
46 citations recorded by the source corpus.
As the public seeks greater accountability and transparency from machine learning algorithms, the research literature on methods to explain algorithms and their outputs has rapidly expanded. Feature importance methods form a popular class of explanation methods. In this paper, we apply the lens of feminist epistemology to recent feature importance research. We investigate what epistemic values are implicitly embedded in feature importance methods and how or whether they are in conflict with feminist epistemology. We offer some suggestions on how to conduct research on explanations that respects feminist epistemic values, taking into account the importance of social context, the epistemic privileges of subjugated knowers, and adopting more interactional ways of knowing
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jonas Schuett
- Luciano Floridi
- Jakob Mokander
- Hannah Rose Kirk
- Jessica Morley
- Anastasia Chan
- Josh Cowls
Citations in the corpus
- Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach (2023, background): “That problematises saying anything meaningful about risks like unjust discrimination on a model level [218].”