Why will is not a modal

By Mikhail Kissine. 2008

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5eb05de1a2808c62d0caecef4dc0ad0ab3928c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Henry Davis
2. Fabrizio Cariani
3. Lisa Matthewson
4. H. Rullmann
5. Paolo Santorio

In Language and Linguistics

1. Fabrizio Cariani
2. H. Rullmann
3. Paolo Santorio

In Philosophy

1. Henry Davis
2. Fabrizio Cariani
3. Lisa Matthewson
4. H. Rullmann
5. Paolo Santorio

Citations in the corpus

• Will done Better: Selection Semantics, Future Credence, and Indeterminacy (2018, background): “Arguments against them are found in Comrie (1989) and Kissine (2008).”
• Modals as distributive indefinites (2008, background): “The future in English and other languages is often assumed to involve quantification over worlds (see Enc¸ 1996; Copley 2002; Condoravdi 2001; among many others, although see Kissine 2008 for a counterproposal).”