Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies

By N. Höhne, Michel G. J. den Elzen, D. Escalante. 2014

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5d5c5b0d1c74709368eda647e2d33192445761b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations (2018, background): “Recognising the range of burden-sharing frameworks (Höhne et al., 2014; IPCC, 2014a; Raupach et al., 2014) a very constrained carbon budget raises the question of whether a formal burden-sharing regime for 2°C remains viable (Sharmina et al., 2015).”
Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets? (2019, methodology): “…a number of recent peer-reviewed studies attempt this task using a range of effortsharing allocations according to different equity principles (CAT, 2018a; Höhne et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2017; Robiou du Pont et al., 2017), using similar IPCC AR5 effort-sharing categories (Höhne et al., 2014).”
Beyond national climate action: the impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions (2020, methodology): “The first is the ‘partial effect’ method, which uses 2°C–consistent emission levels based on a range of effortsharing approaches calculated by Höhne et al. (2014) as threshold values to quantify the additional emissions reductions.”
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? (2017, background): “Hence, to distribute efforts across sectors and regions, other aspects besides cost-efficiency i.e. equity should be considered (Höhne et al 2014, Tavoni et al 2015) to determine how to best meet policy objectives in addition to climate change mitigation.”