What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test?
By Sangseok Lee, Dong Kyu Lee. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2018
905 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Multiple comparisons tests (MCTs) are performed several times on the mean of experimental conditions. When the null hypothesis is rejected in a validation, MCTs are performed when certain experimental conditions have a statistically significant mean difference or there is a specific aspect between the group means. A problem occurs if the error rate increases while multiple hypothesis tests are performed simultaneously. Consequently, in an MCT, it is necessary to control the error rate to an appropriate level. In this paper, we discuss how to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously while limiting type I error rate, which is caused by α inflation. To choose the appropriate test, we must maintain the balance between statistical power and type I error rate. If the test is too conservative, a type I error is not likely to occur. However, concurrently, the test may have insufficient power resulted in increased probability of type II error occurrence. Most researchers may hope to find the best way of adjusting the type I error rate to discriminate the real differences between observed data without wasting too much statistical power. It is expected that this paper will help researchers understand the differences between MCTs and apply them appropriately.
Subfields: Physiology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5d22bc8f213c922ab6040af3864c5364ea8ee28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Application of Student's t-test, Analysis of Variance, and Covariance (2019, methodology): “05), select any multiple comparison methods from least significant difference (LSD), Bonferroni, Tukey’s, etc.[15,16] If variances are not homogeneous (P < 0.”