Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues

By Joe Zuntz, Erin Sheldon, S. Samuroff, M. Troxel, Michael J. Jarvis, N. MacCrann, Daniel Gruen, J. Prat, C. Sánchez, A. Choi and 97 more. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data set, covering 1500 deg2 with a median redshift of 0.59. The catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied to riz bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses amaximum-likelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was applied to r-band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science. We estimate the 1σ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to be 0.013 and 0.025 for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues, respectively.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5ce5e35753ad77e859c10862a6b8ac3a99a72aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  3. Will J. Percival
  4. J. Tinker
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. Risa Wechsler
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Risa Wechsler
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. J. Tinker
  6. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. Will J. Percival

Citations in the corpus