Bumblebee Preadators Reduce Pollinator Density and Plant Fitness
By R. Dukas. 2005
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5cb027d49d9af8ace40e2f240d29c1a503e1d73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
- A. D. Higginson
- Tom Reader
- T. Roulston
- Francis Gilbert
- K. Goodell
- J. Ness
- C. Barnard
- Jessica R. K. Forrest
In Plant Science
- A. D. Higginson
- Tom Reader
- T. Roulston
- Francis Gilbert
- K. Goodell
- J. Ness
- C. Barnard
- Jessica R. K. Forrest
Citations in the corpus
- The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. (2011, background): “A study conducted near an aggregation of Philanthus bicinctus found that the predator had significantly reduced the local forager density of bumble bees, which further led to a significant reduction in pollination of a bumble bee–pollinated plant, Aconitum columbianum (24).”
- A mutualism's indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators (2006, background): “Ecologists are becoming increasingly aware of the links between pollination and herbivory (Mothershead and Marquis 2000, Strauss et al. 2002, Strauss and Murch 2004) and between pollination and predation (Dukas and Morse 2003, Suttle 2003, Dukas 2005).”
- The effects of predation risk from crab spiders on bee foraging behavior (2006, background): “, this study) and plants (Suttle 2003; Muñoz and Arroyo 2004; Dukas 2005) having reduced survival or fitness in the presence of predators.”