Species richness of crustacean zooplankton and trophic structure of brackish lagoons in contrasting climate zones: north temperate Denmark and Mediterranean Catalonia (Spain)

By S. Brucet, D. Boix, S. Gascón, J. Sala, X. Quintana, A. Badosa, M. Søndergaard, T. Lauridsen, Erik Jeppesen. 2009

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We sought to identify environmental factors influencing crustacean zooplankton species richness in brackish lagoons and to elucidate whether crustacean zooplankton species richness and trophic structure of brackish lagoons differ among two regions with contrasting temperatures. We sampled 35 and 42 brackish lagoons (salinity ranging from 0.3 to 55‰) in Mediterranean Catalonia (NE Spain) and northern-temperate Denmark, respectively. No significant differences were found in total crustacean zooplankton species richness or cladoceran richness between the climatic regions. Calanoid richness was higher in Denmark than in Catalonia, while cyclopoid richness was higher in Catalonia. Salinity was the most important variable associated with zooplankton species richness in both regions, richness of total zooplankton species, cladocerans and cyclopoids being negatively related with salinity. In both regions, a shift occurred from dominance of large filter feeding cladoceran species at low salinities to copepods and small cladoceran species at higher salinities. Cladoceran richness increased with increasing total phosphorus, but was not influenced by total nitrogen or chlorophyll-a. Trophic structure in Mediterranean brackish lagoons showed a more pronounced seasonal variation than in north temperate brackish lagoons. Our results imply that the indirect effects of climate warming, such as changes in salinity and hydrology, will have a larger impact on brackish lagoon ecosystems than the increase in temperature per se.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c57ff4c0d97c44d864dfa29a574c27f593e96ae4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

  1. Erik Jeppesen
  2. M. Søndergaard
  3. M. Meerhoff
  4. T. Lauridsen
  5. N. Mazzeo
  6. S. Declerck
  7. C. Iglesias
  8. L. De Meester

In Oceanography

  1. M. Søndergaard
  2. L. De Meester
  3. N. Mazzeo

Citations in the corpus