Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project

By J. Bringer, L. Johnston, C. Brackenridge. 2004

445 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c57e6f302aacd94dbd334fc8fcfdc563180904c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Andrew Hutchison
2. Jeff Breckon
3. Jessie Brouwers
4. Popi Sotiriadou
5. T. Le
6. Shelley L. Craig
7. L. Johnston

In Gender Studies

1. Jessie Brouwers
2. Popi Sotiriadou
3. T. Le
4. Andrew Hutchison
5. Jeff Breckon
6. Shelley L. Craig
7. L. Johnston
8. Lauren B. McInroy

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

1. Jessie Brouwers
2. Popi Sotiriadou
3. T. Le
4. Andrew Hutchison
5. Jeff Breckon
6. L. Johnston

Citations in the corpus

• Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example (2010, methodology): “In addition, Bringer et al. (2006a) refer to the paradigm model as a heuristic tool often adopted by grounded theorists to assist with theoretical development, but fail to demonstrate how NVivo may facilitate its use.”
• Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: a comparison of NVivo and Leximancer (2014, methodology): “Hence, the study findings reiterate the value of NVivo to studies using a grounded theory approach (see Bringer, Johnston, and Brackenridge 2006).”
• Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation (2017, background): “…consumption by LGBTQ young people remains under-researched, the reciprocal process of collecting and analyzing data facilitates ongoing conceptualization, categorization, comparison, questioning, theorizing, and evaluation (Bringer, Johnston, and Brackenridge 2006; Charmaz 2006, 2011; Flick 2006).”