What's so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies?

By Helen Meekosha, R. Shuttleworth. 2009

488 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical autism studies: exploring epistemic dialogues and intersections, challenging dominant understandings of autism (2016, unknown): “…focus must also build on the increasing interest among disability studies scholars in knowledge of and perspectives from the Global south, especially approaches that account for the enduring role of colonialism and racism in producing disability (see discussion in Meekosha and shuttleworth 2009).”
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies (2019, background): “Over the last decade we have witnessed the rise of Critical Disability Studies (for example, Shildrick 2004, 2007, 2012; Meekosha and Shuttleworth 2009; Goodley 2012, 2014, 2016; Mallett and Runswick-Cole 2014; Liasidou 2014; Vanderkinderen, Roets, and Van Hove 2014; Moeller 2015; Slater 2015;…”