How Do Groups Solve Local Commons Dilemmas? Lessons from Experimental Economics in the Field
By Juan-Camilo Cardenas. 2000
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c567716a15332605dfefc8d69d8ba82c98be376a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
- Elinor Ostrom
- Björn Vollan
- Juan-Camilo Cardenas
- Marco A. Janssen
- François Bousquet
- J. Marty Anderies
- Robert Tobias
- María López
Citations in the corpus
- The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance (2011, methodology): “For the particular case of commons users, Cardenas (2000b) found a strong correlation between actual experience of the participants with extraction of resources and their capacity to solve the commons dilemma in the experiment.”
- Real wealth and experimental cooperation: experiments in the field lab (2003, background): “In another paper ( Cardenas , 2001 ) , I discuss how for these same 10 groups one can correlate the social efficiency achieved at the end of the experiment with the percentage of players with their main income being from extractive activities , or negatively with the percentage of players having…”
- The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources (2006, background): “Cardenas also found that ‘social distance and group inequality based on the economic wealth of the people in the group seemed to constrain the effectiveness of communication for this same sample of groups’ (Cardenas, 2000, p. 317; see also Cardenas, 2003).”
- “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies (2005, unknown): “1”