Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication.

By Robert M. Krauss, S. Weinheimer. 1966

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs (2022, background): “, 2005) and used (Clark, 1996) in collaborative and interactive settings (Clark and Schaefer, 1989), which allow interlocutors to give immediate feedback to each other on whether their language was understood (Clark and Krych, 2004) or should be adjusted (Krauss and Weinheimer, 1966), and observe th”
Anchoring Comprehension in Linguistic Precedents (2002, background): “The more frequently speakers refer to a referent, the more they tend to standardize their description (Clark & Wilkes- Gibbs, 1986; Krauss & Weinheimer, 1964, 1966).”
Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use (2012, background): “Partners completing an interactive referential communication task (Krauss & Weinheimer, 1966), for example, establish and refine joint names for gamepieces which facilitate completion of the task as it progresses (Clark & WilkesGibbs, 1986; Wilkes-Gibbs & Clark, 1992).”
Speakers’ experiences and audience design: knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees☆ (2002, methodology): “Research using referential communication tasks has unfailingly demonstrated increased efficiency across rounds (e.g., Clark & Wilkes-Gibbs, 1986; Hupet et al., 1991; Krauss & Weinheimer, 1964, 1966; Schober & Clark, 1989).”