Digital Single Lens Reflex Camera Identification From Traces of Sensor Dust
By A. Dirik, Husrev Taha Sencar, Nasir D. Memon. 2008
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Bernt Schiele
- Mario Fritz
- Luc Van Gool
- Trevor Darrell
- Xiaogang Wang
- Seong Joon Oh
- Dacheng Tao
- Jitendra Malik
In Media Technology
- Mario Fritz
- Rodrigo Benenson
- Vladimir I. Iglovikov
- Artur Kuzin
- Ruslan Dautov
- Artur Fattakhov
- Seong Joon Oh
- Gajanan K. Birajdar
Citations in the corpus
- Faceless Person Recognition: Privacy Implications in Social Media (2016, background): “Some works have shown that it is possible to identify the camera taking the photos (and thus link photos and events via the photographer), either from the file itself [7] or from recognisable sensing noise [8, 9].”
- Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: A survey (2013, methodology): “Dirik et al. (2008) proposed a source camera identification method based on detection and matching of the sensor dust characteristics with average 99% identification accuracy.”
- Camera Model Identification Using Convolutional Neural Networks (2018, background): “Hardware category considers features of camera hardware, such as lens [12], [13] and harge Coupled Device (CCD) sensors [14].”
- Using decision fusion of feature selection in digital forensics for camera source model identification (2012, methodology): “When the method of detecting intrinsic hardware artifacts is adopted, artifacts such as pattern noise [18,21,22,26], lens radial distortion [11], chromatic aberration [44] or sensor dust [16] are used as the fingerprint or biometric to identify either the brand/model source or device source.”