A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS

By W. Link, John R. Sauer. 2002

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5101471eb177b20aa54e74b71e55fa8e63734d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Decomposing trends in Swedish bird populations using generalized additive mixed models (2016, methodology): “Extended versions of this basic model have been applied to, for example, the North American Breeding Bird Survey data (Link & Sauer 2002; Sauer et al. 2008).”
A Hierarchical Model for Regional Analysis of Population Change Using Christmas Bird Count Data, with Application to the American Black Duck (2006, methodology): “Link and Sauer (2002) provide a discussion of the use of MCMC for Bayesian approaches to fitting hierarchical models.”
Building statistical models to analyze species distributions. (2006, background): “However, the Bayesian approach has strong advantages when building complex, hierarchical models (Link and Sauer 2002, Clark 2003, Hooten et al. 2003), so we construct all the models in this framework.”
Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey Using Hierarchical Models (2011, methodology): “Link and Sauer (2002) proposed a log-linear hierarchical model for analysis of population change in the BBS.”
WinBUGS for population ecologists: bayesian modeling using markov chain Monte Carlo methods (2009, background): “…2006), imperfect detection (Royle and Dorazio 2006), heterogeneity in the detection process (Durban and Elston 2005), excess of zeros (Martin et al. 2005b; Ghosh et al. 2006), observer effects (Thogmartin et al. 2004), detecting trends (Link and Sauer 2002) and missing data (Lens et al. 2002).”
Abundance, Density and Relative Abundance: A Conceptual Framework (2011, background): “(2002), Pollock et al. (2002) and others stress their discomfort with the use of indices to monitor populations because of the formidable challenge of meeting model assumptions and, often, the inability to test these assumptions.”
On thinning of chains in MCMC (2012, background): “…were in a paper published by the British Ecological Society (BES) in 2001 (Groombridge et al. 2001) and in five papers published by the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in 2002 (Gross, Craig, & Hutchison 2002; Link & Sauer 2002; Mac Nally & Fleishman 2002; O’Hara et al. 2002; Sauer & Link 2002).”
A HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL MODEL OF AVIAN ABUNDANCE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS (2004, methodology): “Link and Sauer (2002) proposed an objective Bayesian hierarchical model for estimating trends in avian counts.”
Occupancy dynamics in a tropical bird community: unexpectedly high forest use by birds classified as non‐forest species (2010, background): “Hierarchical community models postulate weak relationships among related parameters, in this case by assuming that species-speciﬁc parameter values are drawn from a common, community-level distribution (Link & Sauer 2002).”
Estimates from non‐replicated population surveys rely on critical assumptions (2015, methodology): “Similarly, the analysis framework for the North American Breeding Bird Survey (Robbins, Bystrak & Geissler 1986) is based on refinements of this basicmodel (where the refinements concern variability in skill among observers, overdispersion, etc.; Link & Sauer 1998, 2002).”
The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts (2013, background): “See Link and Sauer (2002) and Sauer and Link (2002) for details of these analyses and the conceptual issues associated with regional models of bird population change.”
Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds (2014, unknown): “Trends for each species are based on the ratio of abundances derived from hierarchical model estimates of the annual abundance of each species during the first and last years of the study period (Link & Sauer, 2002).”