Resolving the obscuring torus in NGC 1068 with the power of infrared interferometry: revealing the inner funnel of dust

By D. Raban, W. Jaffe, H. Rottgering, K. Meisenheimer, K. Tristram. 2009

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present new interferometric data obtained with MIDI (MID infrared Interferometric instrument) for the Seyfert II galaxy NGC 1068, with an extensive coverage of sixteen uv points. These observations resolve the nuclear mid-infrared emission from NGC 1068 in unprecedented detail with a maximum resolution of 7 mas. For the first time, suffi cient uv points have been obtained, allowing us to generate an image of the source using maximum entropy image reconstruction. The features of the image are similar to tho se obtained by modelling. We find that the mid-infrared emission can be represented by two components, each with a Gaussian brightness distribution. The first, identified as the inner f unnel of the obscuring torus, is hot (∼800K), 1.35 parsec long, and 0.45 parsec thick in FWHM at a PA=−42 ◦ (from north to east). It has an absorption profile di fferent than standard interstellar dust and with evidence for clumpiness. The second component is 3× 4 pc in FWHM with T=∼300K, and we identify it with the cooler body of the torus. The compact component is tilted by∼ 45 ◦ with respect to the radio jet and has similar size and orientation to the obse rved water maser distribution. We show how the dust distribution relates to other observables within a few parsecs of the core of the galaxy such as the nuclear masers, the radio jet, and the i onization cone. We compare our findings to a similar study of the Circinus galaxy and other re levant studies. Our findings shed new light on the relation between the different parsec-scale components in NGC 1068 and the obscuring torus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c50bc0129c9ff56a60304d00861cd3daab25fc66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. H. Netzer
  2. D. M. Alexander
  3. R. Hickox
  4. M. Kishimoto
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. S. Hönig
  8. V. Wakelam

In Instrumentation

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. R. Hickox
  3. J. Fritz
  4. M. Stalevski
  5. Maarten Baes
  6. Wolfgang J. Duschl
  7. D. Asmus
  8. L. Tacconi

Citations in the corpus