Ultrastructural biomarkers as tools to characterize the health status of fish in contaminated streams

By Maike Gernhöfer, Michael Pawert, M. Schramm, E. Müller, R. Triebskorn. 2001

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4ed0e5aaba4241aab231a608d72f760988334d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Han-Ping Wang

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. M. J. Zorriehzahra
2. Sana Ullah

Citations in the corpus

• Ecotoxicology: a review of pesticides induced toxicity in fish. (2015, background): “ganism as for as bio-monitoring studies are concern (Landolt and Kocan, 1983; Gernhofer et al., 2001).”
• Toxicology of arsenic in fish and aquatic systems (2016, background): “Fish are usually considered as an organism of choice for assessing the effects of environmental pollution on aquatic ecosystems (Gernhöfer et al. 2001; Gaim et al. 2015).”
• Histopathology of gills, kidney and liver of a Neotropical fish caged in an urban stream (2007, background): “It could be possible that the short period of exposure may have not been sufficient to start the regeneration process, because this phenomenon usually starts from 2 to 4 weeks after exposure to the stressor (Reimschuessel, 2001), and could even take 2 months to be completed (Gernhofer et al., 2001).”