Improving Document-Level Sentiment Classification Using Importance of Sentences
By Gihyeon Choi, Shinhyeok Oh, H. Kim. 2020
30 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Previous researchers have considered sentiment analysis as a document classification task, in which input documents are classified into predefined sentiment classes. Although there are sentences in a document that support important evidences for sentiment analysis and sentences that do not, they have treated the document as a bag of sentences. In other words, they have not considered the importance of each sentence in the document. To effectively determine polarity of a document, each sentence in the document should be dealt with different degrees of importance. To address this problem, we propose a document-level sentence classification model based on deep neural networks, in which the importance degrees of sentences in documents are automatically determined through gate mechanisms. To verify our new sentiment analysis model, we conducted experiments using the sentiment datasets in the four different domains such as movie reviews, hotel reviews, restaurant reviews, and music reviews. In the experiments, the proposed model outperformed previous state-of-the-art models that do not consider importance differences of sentences in a document. The experimental results show that the importance of sentences should be considered in a document-level sentiment classification task.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Sentiment & Opinion Analysis
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Natural Language Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamic Neural Networks: A Survey (2021, background): “Others Time series forecasting [248], [249], [250], Link prediction [251], Recommendation system [77], [252], [253], [254] Graph classification [121], Document classification [156], [255], [256], [257], Stereo confidence estimation [258]”