What are the farm-level impacts of Malawi's farm input subsidy program? A critical review
By R. Lunduka, Jacob Ricker-Gilbert, M. Fisher. 2013
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Health Professions, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4d1c4739f2eb1e4d7a36e33920c3bd94c7ce33b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In General Health Professions
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Review: Taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs (2018, unknown): “More recent and detailed analyses have cast significant doubts on the Malawi program’s early successes (Lunduka et al., 2013; RickerGilbert et al., 2011; Chinsinga and Poulton, 2014; Jayne and Rashid, 2013; Messina et al., 2017).7 Nevertheless, as argued by Jayne and 4 For example, since 2014,…”
- How does population density influence agricultural intensification and productivity? Evidence from Malawi (2014, background): “9 For a thorough review of input subsidies in Malawi see Dorward and Chirwa (2011) and Lunduka et al. (2013). maize prices, agricultural intensification and household wellbeing.”
- The impact of agricultural extension services in the context of a heavily subsidized input system: The case of Malawi (2018, background): “This is consistent with findings by Lunduka, Ricker-Gilbert, and Fisher (2013) and Ricker-Gilbert and Jayne (2012).”