The impact of common assumptions on canopy radiative transfer simulations: A case study in Citrus orchards

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

New estimates of leaf angle distribution from terrestrial LiDAR: Comparison with measured and modelled estimates from nine broadleaf tree species (2019, methodology): “…for models used to represent and understand the plant canopy processes of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, radiative transfer (RT), and hence spectral reflectance and absorptance (Warren Wilson, 1959; Lemeur and Blad, 1974; Ross, 1981; Myneni et al., 1989; Asner, 1998; Stuckens et al., 2009).”
A Review of Nonlinear Hyperspectral Unmixing Methods (2014, methodology): “Similar techniques were used in [89] to simulate orchards.”
Fluspect-B: a model for leaf fluorescence, reflectance and transmittance spectra. (2016, unknown): “A few examples include PROSPECT (Leaf Optical Properties Spectra) developed by Jacquemoud and Baret (1990), LIBERTY (Leaf Incorporating Biochemistry Exhibiting Reflectance and Transmittance Yields) (Dawson et al., 1998) and the work of Stuckens et al. (2009).”
A physically-based model for retrieving foliar biochemistry and leaf orientation using close-range imaging spectroscopy (2016, unknown): “The diffuse component is then expressed as a function of leaf mesophyll Lambert coef ﬁ cient k l and wax DHR ρ spec (Stuckens et al., 2009): where f r , diff does not depend on viewing angles and k l only depends on wavelength.”