Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–20031

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: the case of the EU Common Agricultural Policy reform debate (2014, background): “First, food security is a consensus frame, as initially proposed by Mooney and Hunt (2009). It is a concept that is both pervasive and generally accepted in the CAP debates.”
Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis (2017, methodology): “Policy makers are especially susceptible for the input from epistemic communities if a policy domain is surrounded by uncertainty of the seriousness, causes, effects, and solutions of the problem (Meijerink, 2005).”
Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy (2012, background): “…suggestedcombining the literature on policy entrepreneurship, theACF and other approaches on policy change (e.g., incrementalism, policy streams, institutionalism, punctuated equilibrium, epistemic communities or policy design; seeMintrom andNorman 2009; James and Jorgensen 2009;Meijerink 2005).”