Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul
By Richard Child Hill, J. Kim. 2000
297 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c471b33963bbb1cf05ab2dd8d190d4fb6b753f6c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Development Zones, Foreign Investment, and Global City Formation in Shanghai (2005, background): “This finding is consistent with Hill and Kim’s (2000) argument for the importance of manufacturing in Asian global cities.”
- Sectoral Differentiation and Network Structure Within Contemporary Worldwide Corporate Networks (2011, background): “…trading companies, called “Sogo Shosha”2 (Young 1979; Edgington and Haga 1998), is less transnational and more nationally oriented than expected (Hill and Kim 2001), which raises the question of whether Tokyo can be considered a world city (see also Friedmann 2001; Sassen 2001b; Hill and Kim 2000).”
- Powerful City Networks: More than Connections, Less than Domination and Control (2010, background): “A concern that has now gone well beyond the usual list of dominant cities to include gateway as well as other less commanding cities in the beleaguered quest to be more like the ‘successful’ cities (Gritsai, 1997; Kratke, 1999, 2001; Hill and Kim, 2000; Rossi and Taylor, 2006; Skeldon, 1997).”