Truly Artificial Nest Studies

By J. Faaborg. 2004

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c469dfd6539f9e04a7f0b16f6a2c6a1be40160c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Peter P. Marra
2. Richard T. Holmes
3. A. Anders
4. Keith A. Hobson
5. T. Sillett
6. T. Sherry
7. J. Faaborg
8. Frank R. Thompson

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. T. Sherry
2. Richard T. Holmes
3. Peter P. Marra
4. T. Sillett
5. Keith A. Hobson
6. J. Faaborg
7. A. Anders
8. S. Latta

Citations in the corpus

• Review of impacts of the introduced house mouse on islands in the Southern Ocean: are mice equivalent to rats? (2009, background): “nests and eggs found evidence of mouse predation, although such studies are difficult to interpret (Faaborg 2004; Thompson and Burhans 2004).”
• Vulnerability of ground-nesting waterbirds to predation by invasive American mink in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. (2009, background): “Although artificial nests are widely used in avian field studies (Moore and Robinson, 2004), they have been criticized as not reliably reflecting predators and predation rates of natural nests (e.g., Faaborg, 2003).”
• Recent advances in understanding migration systems of New World land birds (2010, methodology): “Much of the information about nest predation comes from the use of artificial nests, a method with important biases (Faaborg 2004, Moore and Robinson 2004).”