Phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture
By Julien Vignollet, Stefan May, R. de Borst, Clemens V. Verhoosel. Meccanica (Milano. Print), 2014
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c466b9d374e12eafd860ed4068b5e26884857e97
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Thomas Wick
- Miguel Cervera
- Michele Chiumenti
- Stefan May
- Julien Vignollet
- R. de Borst
- G. Barbat
- Timon Rabczuk
In Mechanics of Materials
- Thomas Wick
- Miguel Cervera
- Michele Chiumenti
- Stefan May
- Julien Vignollet
- R. de Borst
- G. Barbat
- Jian-Ying Wu
Citations in the corpus
- A numerical assessment of phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture: Γ-Convergence and stress oscillations (2015, background): “Different from Verhoosel and de Borst(2013) d= 1 is not prescribed at the Gauss points, since this can lead tod > 1 at the nodes (Vignollet et al., 2014).”
- Finite element modeling of quasi-brittle cracks in 2D and 3D with enhanced strain accuracy (2017, background): “More recently, nonlocal constitutive models [6], gradient enhanced [7, 8] and phase field techniques [8-12] have also been considered within the continuous approach.”
- Modified Newton methods for solving fully monolithic phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture propagation (2017, methodology): “As mentioned in the introduction, detailed studies for brittle fracture are presented in [67, 27, 73].”