Editors’ Comment: A Few Guidelines for Quantitative Submissions

By Sarah A. Mustillo, Omar Alcides Lizardo, Rory McVeigh. American Sociological Review, 2018

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c45515e34a170cae41a8fc35a66aa624c4ba2631

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Trenton D. Mize
2. E. Aalto
3. Miguel I. Aguirre-Urreta
4. Long Doan
5. J. Long
6. Mikko Rönkkö
7. Henni Tenhunen

In Statistics and Probability

1. Trenton D. Mize
2. E. Aalto
3. Miguel I. Aguirre-Urreta
4. Long Doan
5. J. Long
6. Mikko Rönkkö
7. Henni Tenhunen

Citations in the corpus

• A General Framework for Comparing Predictions and Marginal Effects across Models (2019, methodology): “…differences by examining only the statistical significance of an effect within each model; this approach has been criticized because it is necessary to directly test cross-model differences to determine their statistical significance (Gelman and Stern 2006; Mustillo, Lizardo, and McVeigh 2018).”
• Eight Simple Guidelines for Improved Understanding of Transformations and Nonlinear Effects (2021, background): “However, only checking the interaction provides a misleading picture of moderation (Greene, 2010; Mize, 2019; Mustillo et al., 2018).”