Refined methods for the identifiability of tensors

By Cristiano Bocci, Luca Chiantini, Giorgio Ottaviani. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 2013

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We prove that the general tensor of size 2n\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^n$$\end{document} and rank k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k$$\end{document} has a unique decomposition as the sum of decomposable tensors if k≤0.99972nn+1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k\le 0.9997\frac{2^n}{n+1}$$\end{document} (the constant 1 being the optimal value). Similarly, the general tensor of size 3n\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$3^n$$\end{document} and rank k\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k$$\end{document} has a unique decomposition as the sum of decomposable tensors if k≤0.9983n2n+1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k\le 0.998\frac{3^n}{2n+1}$$\end{document} (the constant 1 being the optimal value). Some results of this flavor are obtained for tensors of any size, but the explicit bounds obtained are weaker.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c44b078a7d9fd9c1097204c986e1626429d3ef5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Giorgio Ottaviani
  2. Nick Vannieuwenhoven
  3. Alessandra Bernardi

In Computational Mathematics

  1. Alessandra Bernardi
  2. Luca Chiantini
  3. Nick Vannieuwenhoven
  4. Enrico Carlini
  5. A. Oneto
  6. Alessandro Gimigliano
  7. M. Catalisano
  8. Giorgio Ottaviani

Citations in the corpus