Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions

By C. Dupré, J. Ehrlén. 2002

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c44a6055cac854e4cece6dc1d7b1f3807b3868e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Fingerprints of environmental change on the rare mediterranean flora: a 115‐year study (2006, background): “Different sets of niche characteristics and life history traits may translate into different responses to habitat quality and spatial configuration (Harrison, 1999; Dupré & Ehrlén, 2002), and then into different dynamics when facing habitat fragmentation and environmental change.”
Traits related to species persistence and dispersal explain changes in plant communities subjected to habitat loss (2012, background): “Therefore, clonal species may have more limited capacity to respond rapidly to changing environmental conditions (Dupré & Ehrlén, 2002; Buckley & Freckleton, 2010; Lindborg et al., 2012).”
Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape (2011, background): “For instance, regarding all forest fragments as suitable habitat for understorey species is error-prone as subtle differences in e.g. soil acidity may suffice to make a habitat uninhabitable for a subset (e.g. Dupré and Ehrlén 2002).”
Effects of Life‐History Traits on Responses of Plant Species to Forest Fragmentation (2005, methodology): “…patterns among plant life-history traits, for example, the trade-off between diaspore mass and number ( Jakobsson & Eriksson 2000; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002), the negative correlation between seed longevity and seed mass (Bekker et al. 1998; Verheyen et al. 2003), the relationship between…”
Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in European agricultural landscapes (2008, background): “…broad response groups have been proposed, such as habitat generalists or matrix species vs habitat specialists, weeds or ruderals vs species of conservation value and hemeroby classes of species (Cook et al. 2002; Brentrup et al. 2002; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002; Hill et al. 2002; Adriaens et al. 2006).”
The role of fragment area and isolation in the conservation of heathland species (2005, background): “Nevertheless, their high diversity of specific plant and animal species ( De Smidt, 1975; Schamine ´e et al., 1996) and the fact that they are one of the principal semi-natural landscapes in Western Europe (Webb, 1998) confers on them a high conservation value.”
Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “…be more strongly affected than others (e.g. annuals) Dupré and Ehrlén (2002), Kolb and Diekmann (2005) Seed bank Long-lived seed banks may prevent species from going extinct in small habitat fragments Dupré and Ehrlén (2002) The list highlights some key traits but is not intended to be exhaustive.”
The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants (2006, background): “Many ecological studies on plants are now based on some form of conservation genetics framework (e.g. Dupré & Ehrlén 2002; Luijten et al. 2002; Booth & Grime 2003; Lienert & Fischer 2003; Oostermeijer et al. 2003; Vergeer et al. 2003; Ashworth et al. 2004; Brys et al. 2004; Kolb 2005; Nicolé et al.…”
The role of land-use history in major invasions by woody plant species in the northeastern North American landscape (2009, background): “Indeed, several recent papers have pointed to the over-riding importance of land-use history in understanding and predicting the distribution and abundance of plant species in general (Bellemare et al. 2002; Donohue et al. 2000; Dupre and Ehrlen 2002; Verheyen et al. 2003a, b; Vila et al. 2003), and”
Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments (2004, background): “This weakens the predictive power of patterns of distribution for the underlying processes (e.g. Quintana-Ascencio & Menges 1996; Bastin & Thomas 1999; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002).”
Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum (2005, background): “…specificity, low seed production, restricted dispersal capacity or small size, are especially adversely affected by changes in land use, and particularly by habitat fragmentation, as demonstrated by landscape-scale analyses of patterns of patch occupancy (e.g. Dupré & Ehrlén 2002; Verheyen et al .”
Seed predation, not seed dispersal, explains the landscape‐level abundance of an early‐successional plant (2006, background): “Both may also play an important role in the landscape-dependent patterns of plant establishment that have been repeatedly noted (e.g. Quintana-Ascencio & Menges 1996; Ehrlén & Eriksson 2000; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002).”
The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach (2005, background): “The only relevant studies concluded that the relative influence of regional factors, on forest fragment occupancy patterns, was far less important than that of local habitat characteristics (Dupré & Ehrlén, 2002; Kolb & Diekmann, 2004).”
Invasion of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and the rise of the boreal ecosystem in Fennoscandia (2009, background): “…dimension of modern tree distribution patterns, observed also in the temperate forests in Europe (Peterken & Game 1984; Wulf 1997; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002), must be incorporated into analyses of species composition and distribution patterns in the present boreal forest (Dupré & Ehrlén 2002).”
Effects of settlement size, urban heat island and habitat type on urban plant biodiversity (2017, background): “This is why such habitats would host fewer species in smaller populations, which can be more prone to local extinction (Dupré & Ehrlén, 2002; Jackson & Sax, 2010; Tilman, 1994).”