SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN DETECTION PROBABILITY OF PLETHODON SALAMANDERS USING THE ROBUST CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DESIGN

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Making Great Leaps Forward: Accounting for Detectability in Herpetological Field Studies (2007, methodology): “The idea, as applied by Bailey et al. (2004d), is to nest a series of closed population model analyses, one for each primary period, within an open population analysis based on either the CJS or multistate models.”
Abundance, biomass production, nutrient content, and the possible role of terrestrial salamanders in Missouri Ozark forest ecosystems (2014, background): “Terrestrial salamanders are fossorial, are only surface active on moist cool nights, are seasonally abundant, and have inherently low detection levels (Bailey et al. 2004a).”
ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY PARAMETERS FOR PLETHODON SALAMANDERS USING THE ROBUST CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DESIGN (2004, methodology): “We reported the means of these estimates here, but refer readers to Bailey et al. (2004) for more detailed, replication-based analysis.”
Monitoring the distribution of pond‐breeding amphibians when species are detected imperfectly (2005, result): “As a consequence the proportion of sites occupied by a species was underestimated and changes in site occupancy underestimated true changes (Table 5). This study thus supports the claim that amphibian population and community studies need to take into account low and variable detection probabilities”