Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA

By Kerry A. Chase. International Organization, 2003

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c43f79cd05cee4ba6eedde48cc3b07b93152f22e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Lisa Lechner
2. Andreas Dür
3. Leonardo Baccini
4. Manfred Elsig
5. Stephen Weymouth
6. Sonal S. Pandya
7. Kathleen A. Collins
8. Pablo M. Pinto

In Public Administration

1. Leonardo Baccini
2. Stephen Weymouth
3. Sonal S. Pandya
4. Kathleen A. Collins
5. Andreas Dür
6. Lisa Lechner

In Strategy and Management

1. Andreas Dür
2. Leonardo Baccini
3. Stephen Weymouth
4. Sonal S. Pandya
5. Kathleen A. Collins
6. Lisa Lechner
7. Manfred Elsig

Citations in the corpus

• The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence (2017, background): “Chase, K. (2003). Economic interests and regional trading arrangements: The case of nafta.”
• The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset (2013, background): “Much work has focused on arguments drawing on competition effects among important trading nations and/or interest group mobilization and industry and market characteristics (Baldwin 1993; Baccini and D¨ur 2012; Chase 2003; D¨ur 2007; Grossman and Helpman 1995; Manger 2009; Milner 1997).”
• Economic and Security Regionalism among Patrimonial Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Central Asia (2009, background): “…role of domestic interest groups and societal pressures in order to explain patterns of support for trade liberalisation (Kahler 1995; Milner 1992; Chase 2003).4 Government policy reflects the preferences either of the strongest and best-organised factors and interest groups (Frieden 1988;…”
• The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements (2016, background): “High labour and environmental standards are also cost burdens for vertical multinationals, whose motivation for investing is driven by low costs in the host country’s factor prices (Chase, 2003).”
• Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting (2017, unknown): “Chase 2003; Manger 2009; and Osgood 2016.”
• Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century (2016, background): “Chase (2003) finds US industries more suited to regional vertical integration were more likely to lobby Congress in support of the North American Free Trade Agreement. www.annualreviews.org • Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment 461 A nn u.”