Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: Characterization and thermodynamic modeling
By Beth E. Carroll, R. Otis, J. Borgonia, J. Suh, R. P. Dillon, Andrew A. Shapiro, D. Hofmann, Zi-kui Liu, Allison M. Beese. 2016
560 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c43e0b64ca3728a63582d0677886415433deadd2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties (2018, methodology): “Both microcracks [602,604] spanning no more than a layer and macrocracks spanning the entire sample [597,598,600] have been observed.”
- Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice (2020, methodology): “In additive manufacturing, this can be accomplished through a precise control of process parameters [90,96].”
- Additive manufacturing for energy: A review (2020, background): “[61] Carroll BE, Otis RA, Borgonia JP, Suh J-O, Dillon RP, Shapiro AA, et al.”
- Metal Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review (2020, background): “Direct energy deposition [20, 45-55] Large build volume possible Graded materials capability Good mechanical properties Ability to build on or repair parts High cost (both machine depreciation and operation) Low resolution Significant residual stress Relatively rough surface”
- An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing (2018, methodology): “The laser-based DED can be used to fabricate metallic parts with a gradient in composition by adjusting the volume of metallic powders delivered to the melt pool as a ―function of position‖ [Caroll, 2016].”