Let's face it: It's a cortical network

By Alumit Ishai. NeuroImage, 2008

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions (2011, positive): “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of face perception reliably identify multiple face-selective cortical regions (Kanwisher and Yovel, 2006; Ishai, 2008; Fox et al., 2009; Pinsk et al., 2009), but the functional operations performed in these regions are not yet clearly understood.”
The neural dynamics of updating person impressions. (2013, background): “…facial expressions (static: Haxby et al., 2000; Hoffman and Haxby, 2000; Adolphs, 2002; LaBar et al., 2003; Calder and Young, 2005; by guest on M ay 23, 2016 http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from Engell and Haxby, 2007; Ishai, 2008; dynamic: Ghazanfar et al., 2010; Said et al., 2010).”
Distributed Neural Systems for Face Perception (2011, background): “…focused on models that posit the existence of a module that is specialized for face perception (Kanwisher et al., 1997 ; Kanwisher and Yovel, 2006 ) versus models that propose that face perception is mediated by distributed processing (Haxby et al., 2000 , 2001 ; Ishai et al., 2005 ; Ishai 2008 ).”
The role of prediction in social neuroscience (2012, background): “The STS also appears to have a role in face perception, and the perception of the dynamic features of a face (Haxby et al., 2000; Gobbini and Haxby, 2007; Ishai, 2008).”