Felled or standing retained wood: it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles

By M. Jonsell, J. Weslien. 2003

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c43451fc19e41332c3c419f2a03140aa1ab68629

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Experimental studies of dead-wood biodiversity — A review identifying global gaps in knowledge (2015, unknown): “wood was slightly more frequently reported to host fewer species than downed logs, but species assemblages differed strongly between the two orientation types (Jonsell and Weslien, 2003; Ulyshen and Hanula, 2009b), with some species, including red-listed ones, occurring only on snags (Gibb et al.”
Saproxylic beetles in high stumps of spruce: Fungal flora important for determining the species composition (2005, methodology): “In addition, red-listed species have been found in artificial high stumps, especially those of deciduous trees (Jonsell & Weslien, 2003; Jonsell, Nittérus, & Stighäll, 2004; Lindhe & Lindelöw, 2004).”
Silviculture for old-growth attributes (2009, background): “…and understorey (Merrill et al., 1998; Beese and Bryant, 1999), canopy lichens (Coxson and Stevenson, 2005), aerial insects (Deans et al., 2004), ground-layer bryophytes (Dovčiak et al., 2006), small terrestrial mammals (Gitzen et al., 2007) and saproxylic beetles (Jonsell and Weslien, 2003).”
Mimicking natural disturbances of boreal forests: the effects of controlled burning and creating dead wood on beetle diversity (2007, background): “Retained snags and logs on harvested areas increase the abundance of habitats for saproxylic organisms (Kaila et al. 1997; Jonsell and Weslien 2003; Jonsell et al. 2004), and leaving small volumes of retention trees on clear-cuts is currently a recommended practice in Finland (Anonym 2001).”
Saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures (2007, background): “The species richness models also provided support for the importance of resource heterogeneity [CWD position (lying vs. standing) and tree species] in maintaining high species richness in boreal forest stands (see also Martikainen et al., 2000; Jonsell & Weslien, 2003; Similä et al., 2003).”
Management Strategies for Bark Beetles in Conifer Forests (2015, background): “typographus, and several endangered species (Weslien, 1992a; Siitonen, 2001; Jonsell and Weslien, 2003).”
Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management (2009, background): “…out in boreal or sub-boreal forests of Fennoscandia (Siitonen 1994; Kaila et al. 1997; Martikainen et al. 2000; SverdrupThygeson and Ims 2002; Jonsell and Weslien 2003; Wikars S. Vodka M. Konvicka L. Cizek Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska…”
What window traps can tell us: effect of placement, forest openness and beetle reproduction in retention trees (2009, unknown): “Even though the most efficient method for ensuring large samples in forest is the window trap (Hyvarinen et al. 2006), the limitations in the use of these traps have been focused by several authors lately ( Jonsell and Weslien 2003; Martikainen and Kouki 2003; Ranius and Jansson 2002; Wikars et al.”