REASON FOR EMOTION: REINVENTING JUSTICE WITH THEORIES, INNOVATIONS, AND RESEARCH—THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY 2002 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS*

By Lawrence W. Sherman. 2003

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c42e98ec52267628689ec59797ffb2355ac51fc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Braithwaite
2. A. Payne
3. Devon Johnson
4. Alex R. Piquero
5. Kelly Welch
6. Stephanie E Carmichael
7. E. Ahmed
8. David P. Farrington

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Stephanie E Carmichael
2. A. Payne
3. Devon Johnson
4. Kelly Welch
5. J. Braithwaite
6. Alex R. Piquero
7. David Jurgens
8. E. Ahmed

Citations in the corpus

• Forgiveness, Shaming, Shame and Bullying (2005, result): “To date this program has produced mixed results, with a substantial reduction of reoffending in the violence experiment and failure of the property and drink-driving experiments to reduce crime (Sherman, 2003).”
• A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abuse (2019, background): “The notion of procedural justice explains that people are more likely to comply with a community’s rules if they believe the authorities are legitimate (Tyler and Huo, 2002; Sherman, 2003).”
• Restorative Justice in Schools (2015, methodology): “Restorative justice methods used to address student misbehavior in schools are similar to the approaches used in the criminal justice system that effectively focus on repairing the harm caused by crime by involving offenders, victims, and the community (Macready, 2009) through conferences that often”
• Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences (2004, background): “For some, this has raised the question of how central the concept of shaming should be to justice procedures, especially when repairing harm for victims, offenders and others is their primary goal, and whether emotions like empathy and remorse are more crucial (Karstedt, 2002; Maxwell and Morris, 20”
• Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, background): “Although rational choice considerations and perceived emotional arousal are both important in this regard, emotional impulses exert particularly strong influences on decision-making (Massey, 2002; Sherman, 2003).”
• Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies (2009, background): “Examples include the restorative justice movement (see also Sherman, 2003) and punishments meant to shame and humiliate offenders.”