Palaeoecology of the Mammoth Steppe fauna from the late Pleistocene of the North Sea and Alaska: Separating species preferences from geographic influence in paleoecological dental wear analysis

By F. Rivals, Matthew C. Mihlbachler, N. Solounias, D. Mol, G. Semprebon, J. Vos, Daniel Kalthoff. 2010

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Ecology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c420be51f64470cf8b0b055b9a50f1037e735ab7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. A. Lister
2. H. Bocherens
3. F. Rivals
4. A. Stuart
5. A. Larramendi

In Ecology

1. A. Lister
2. H. Bocherens
3. M. Hofreiter
4. F. Rivals
5. A. Stuart

In Paleontology

1. A. Lister
2. H. Bocherens
3. F. Rivals
4. A. Stuart
5. A. Larramendi

Citations in the corpus

• Dietary flexibility and niche partitioning of large herbivores through the Pleistocene of Britain (2016, background): “Grey areas correspond (B) and grazers (G) from Solounias and Semprebon (2002) and Rivals et al. (2010). because of small sample size (few specimens, or specimens discarded for taphonomic reasons).”
• Pleistocene bears in the Swabian Jura (Germany): Genetic replacement, ecological displacement, extinctions and survival (2011, background): “Microwear studies of tooth crowns are one approach to gain data of the texture of the diet (Rivals et al., 2010).”