Contact shape optimization: a bilevel programming approach

By J. Herskovits, A. Leontiev, G. Dias, Geraldo Tadeu dos Santos. 2000

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Shape optimization of 2D structures using simulated annealing (2007, background): “In previous studies, boundaries of the structures were usually defined by spline curves [9,11,23– 25,28,31,35,39–41,46,47,51,56–61,65,66,69–71,76,77,87,88] passing through a number of key points.”
A bilevel optimization approach to automated parameter tuning (2014, methodology): “Researchers in the classical optimization community have attempted to solve bilevel programming problems using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker approach [5, 19], branch-and-bound approach [4], and the use of penalty functions [2].”
A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applications (2017, background): “For optimal design applications, the readers may refer to [22], [46], [83], [93], and [94].”