A restrictive theory of metrical stress

By Brett Hyde. Phonology, 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3fa1149de83edd1da8e0fe8bb10832cd5ec8cde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Junko Ito
2. Armin Mester
3. Jeffrey Heinz

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Junko Ito
2. Armin Mester
3. Jeffrey Heinz

In Language and Linguistics

1. Junko Ito
2. Armin Mester
3. Jeffrey Heinz

Citations in the corpus

• The extended prosodic word (2009, background): “Thus, the precise constituency of the prosodic hierarchy is obviously not ready to be carved in stone at this point, and still other conditions might be violable, such as the proper bracketing aspect of NOTANCLING (as argued by Hyde 2002) and HEADEDNESS.”
• On the role of locality in learning stress patterns* (2009, methodology): “…data used in this study. w3 motivates representing phonotactic patternswith regular sets (i.e. finite-statemachines). w4 defines neighbourhood-distinctness, makes clear its relevance to locality in phonology and applies it to the stress patterns in the typology. w5 discusses how the universality…”