Density ratio dependence of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing for sustained and impulsive acceleration histories

By G. Dimonte, M. Schneider. 2000

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanics of Materials, Molecular Biology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3d58848c187b68401a0ad0160ba9181cce1a7c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

In Molecular Biology

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

The mixing transition in Rayleigh–Taylor instability (2004, background): “This could explain why experiments with immiscible fluids (Read 1984; Dimonte & Schneider 2000) and simulations employing front tracking (Glimm et al. 2001) appear to exhibit faster growth rates than cases with species diffusion (Dimonte et al. 2004).”
A critical analysis of Rayleigh-Taylor growth rates (2001, background): “[24] '91 b 0:07 3D Snider/Andrews [37] '94 b 0:07 0:007 3D Schneider/Dimonte/Remington [34] '99 b 0:054 3D Dimonte/Schneider [11] '99 b 0:05 0:01 3D Simulation Youngs [41] '91 b 0:04 0:05 3D Youngs [42] '99 b 0:03 3D S.”
Investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability under re-shock conditions (2008, background): “Following Dimonte & Schneider (2000) and Oron et al. (2001), the growth coefficient in (1.3) is in the range of 0.28–0.39.”
Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence: self-similar analysis and direct numerical simulations (2004, background): “The quantity 1 4 Co in (3.8) is identified with the traditional α, α = 1 4 Co, which is typically in the range 0.03 α 0.06 (Dimonte & Schneider 2000).”
On the miscible Rayleigh–Taylor instability: two and three dimensions (2001, result): “Other variant forms of this simple model have been applied by Kane & Arnett (1998) and Dimonte & Schneider (1999) for a variety of parameters such as Atwood number and Mach number, and the value of α is claimed to be satisfactorily in agreement with results from either experiments or numerical…”
Cinematographic observation of the collapse and rebound of a laser-produced cavitation bubble near a wall (2003, background): “The structure is emphasized in frame 3, and might be due to a kind of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing (see e.g. Dimonte & Schneider 2000).”
THE RICHTMYER-MESHKOV INSTABILITY (2002, methodology): “The required coefficients are usually obtained from experimental data, and these models have a wide range of applicability (Dimonte & Schneider 2000).”
The influence of initial conditions on turbulent mixing due to Richtmyer–Meshkov instability† (2010, methodology): “This implies the behaviour very similar to the experimental results of Dimonte & Schneider (2000).”
Experimental investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at small Atwood numbers (2004, background): “Dalziel (1993), Snider & Andrews (1994) and Read (1984) report a value of 0.07 from their experiments, while the linear electric motor (LEM) experiments of Dimonte & Schneider (2000) give a value of 0.05.”