DECOMPOSING THE SIZE EFFECT ON THE ADOPTION OF INNOVATIONS: AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY AND PRECISION FARMING

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

INFORMATION AND THE ADOPTION OF PRECISION FARMING TECHNOLOGIES (2003, methodology): “Independent variables included farm and operator variables (table 2). Farm size was measured as the total harvested crop acres (CROPAC), and was specified with a quadratic term (CROPAC2) [see Fernandez-Cornejo, Daberkow, and McBride (2001) for a discussion of the size effect on PF adoption].”
Farmer Willingness to Grow Switchgrass for Energy Production (2007, background): “…size or total acres farmed is expected to have a 11 positive influence on the willingness to grow switchgrass based on other analyses of crop or technology adoption (Fernandez-Cornejo et al. 2001; Gould et al. 1989; Nkonya, et al. 1997; Norris and Batie, 1987; Rajasekharan and Veeraputhran, 2002).”
Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices (2007, methodology): “Fernandez-Cornejo et al. (2001) also used hectares operated to measure the effects of scale on the adoption of agrobiotechnology and precision agriculture technologies.”
Influencing factors and incentives on the intention to adopt precision agricultural technologies within arable farming systems (2019, background): “Socio-economic and structural variables are fairly common within the PAT adoption literature with studies finding that size and financial ability, through higher incomes, drives uptake (Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2001; Olsen and Elisabeth, 2003; Griffin and Lowenberg-DeBoer, 2005; Robertson et al., 2”