Psychopaths: cheaters or warrior-hawks?
By Angela S. Book, V. Quinsey. 2004
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3a2588c7f47c3cd61cfd1b9fb47bcc218ba5c2a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- D. Paulhus
- Daniel N. Jones
- B. Visser
- P. Jonason
- Anthony A. Volk
- Angela S. Book
- Craig Nathanson
- Kevin M. Williams
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: Personality and competence but not demographics (2006, background): “Although some researchers have argued that subclinical psychopaths form a distinct group in student samples ( Book & Quinsey, 2004 ), most argue that subclinical psychopathy is a normally distributed variable (Lilienfeld & Andrews, 1996; Paulhus et al., in press).”
- Different Provocations Trigger Aggression in Narcissists and Psychopaths (2010, background): “These reasons may reflect the different reproductive strategies that provided them an adaptive advantage (e.g., Book & Quinsey, 2004).”
- Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad (2015, background): “Psychopaths are hypothesized to be evolved cheaters who capitalize on the cooperation of others by lacking the natural emotional and cognitive mechanisms that deter antisocial behavior (Book & Quinsey, 2004; Mealey, 1995).”