When Closing the Human–Animal Divide Expands Moral Concern

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Brief Measures of the Animal Attitude Scale (2015, methodology): “Bastian et al. (2012) used a 10-item version to study the effects of framing on moral concern for animals. a 6-item version of the aaS was recently used to study the effects of interacting with animals on the development of positive attitudes and behavior of children (mueller 2014).”
Dehumanization and infrahumanization. (2014, background): “Recently, Bastian et al. (2012c) found evidence that cognitive dissonance partially underlies this dehumanization.”
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “…(Costello & Hodson, 2010) or personally writing essays (Bastian, Costello, Loughnan, & Hodson, 2012), significantly reduces dehumanisation and outgroup prejudice (Costello & Hodson, 2010), decreases speciesism, and increases moral inclusiveness towards human outgroups (Bastian et al., 2012).”