Morphological and physiological traits influencing biomass productivity in short-rotation coppice poplar

By A. Rae, K. M. Robinson, N. Street, Gail Taylor. 2004

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tree Image Growth Analysis Using Instantaneous Phase Modulation (2011, background): “For example, vessels in ring-porous trees—such as oak, chestnut and elm—are generally larger and concentrated in the outermost layer of sapwood [1, 3, 8, 14, 15].”
First vs. second rotation of a poplar short rotation coppice: above-ground biomass productivity and shoot dynamics. (2015, background): “[11] Rae AM, Robinson KM, Street NR, Taylor G.”
Comparative study of biomass determinants of 12 poplar (Populus) genotypes in a high-density short-rotation culture (2013, background): “The study of this variability is then valuable for determining the efficiency of selection for the trait in future breeding and selection processes (Rae et al., 2004).”
QTL for yield in bioenergy Populus: identifying G×E interactions from growth at three contrasting sites (2007, background): “68 ODT ha year (Rae et al. 2004), resulting from short rotation coppiced (SRC) trees grown at a higher density.”