‘Beyond Left and Right’: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare

By Fiona C. Ross. 2000

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c34ee52a456c9018740a74be54497e260c9d9fec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Governments and unpopular social policy reform: Biting the bullet or steering clear? (2009, result): “This suggests that the conditions fostering a losses domain among leftist and rightist governments may differ, which ties onto previous findings (e.g., Levy 1999; Ross 2000).”
Welfare-State Regress in Western Europe: Politics, Institutions, Globalization, and Europeanization (2003, background): “Ross (2000) argues that according to the "Nixon-goes-to-China" logic, left parties traditionally associated with the welfare state expansion are likely to have more "degrees of freedom" to make cuts than do rightist parties.”
Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries (2009, background): “Leftist parties appear to have moved to the right in their rhetoric and policies (Ross 2000).”
Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries (2010, background): “Leftist parties appear to have moved to the right in their rhetoric and policies (Ross 2000; Blyth and Katz 2005).”
The Politics of Welfare State Retrenchment: A Literature Review (2006, background): “…policy programme in a politically – and culturally – acceptable and desirable manner is a key factor that can help explain why some policy alternatives triumph over others and why elected officials decide to 'do something' in the first place " (Béland 2005: 12; see Ross 2000; Green- Pedersen 2002).”