Prenatal exposure to maternal depression and cortisol influences infant temperament.

By Elysia Poggi Davis, Laura M. Glynn, C. Dunkel Schetter, C. Hobel, A. Chicz–DeMet, Curt A. Sandman. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2007

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence indicates that prenatal maternal and fetal processes can have a lasting influence on infant and child development. Results from animal models indicate that prenatal exposure to maternal stress and stress hormones has lasting consequences for development of the offspring. Few prospective studies of human pregnancy have examined the consequences of prenatal exposure to stress and stress hormones. METHOD In this study the effects of prenatal maternal psychosocial (anxiety, depression, and perceived stress) and endocrine (cortisol) indicators of stress on infant temperament were examined in a sample of 247 full-term infants. Maternal salivary cortisol and psychological state were evaluated at 18-20, 24-26, and 30-32 weeks of gestation and at 2 months postpartum. Infant temperament was assessed with a measure of negative reactivity (the fear subscale of the Infant Temperament Questionnaire) at 2 months of age. RESULTS Elevated maternal cortisol at 30-32 weeks of gestation, but not earlier in pregnancy, was significantly associated with greater maternal report of infant negative reactivity. Prenatal maternal anxiety and depression additionally predicted infant temperament. The associations between maternal cortisol and maternal depression remained after controlling for postnatal maternal psychological state. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that prenatal exposure to maternal stress has consequences for the development of infant temperament.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c34261ed940d0ad3b4e0e3ac1ba0cb01b2275df9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

  1. M. Pluess
  2. Curt A. Sandman
  3. Elysia Poggi Davis
  4. M. Weinstock
  5. J. Belsky
  6. A. Masten
  7. I. Boniwell
  8. M. Del Giudice

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. M. Weinstock
  2. Curt A. Sandman
  3. Elysia Poggi Davis
  4. J. Belsky
  5. D. Schmitt
  6. C. Dunkel Schetter

In Social Psychology

  1. Curt A. Sandman
  2. Elysia Poggi Davis
  3. M. Weinstock
  4. J. Belsky
  5. M. Pluess
  6. D. Schmitt
  7. M. Del Giudice

Citations in the corpus