A method for linguistic metaphor identification : from MIP to MIPVU

By Gerard Steen. 2010

1,372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c33fe3ea3ee2b8241c972b74661f52dcab7bbbf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Modeling the interaction between sensory and affective meanings for detecting metaphor (2015, methodology): “…interact in metaphorical expressions, and to this end we have examined a large corpus an-1 notated for metaphor, the Vrije University Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus (VUAMC) (Steen et al., 2010), with respect to such fetures as imageability and concreteness, as well as valence, arousal and dominance.”
The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “Then, we determined if the frames were metaphorical and or hyperbolic by applying the Metaphor Identification Procedure—Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU; see Steen et al., 2010 for coding instructions) and the Hyperbole Identification Procedure (HIP; Burgers, Brugman, Renardel de Lavalette & Steen, 2016) t”
Metaphor in usage (2010, background): “Reliability was good (a full report is offered in Steen et al. 2010).”
DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use (2018, methodology): “Any meaning that cannot be found in these dictionaries is considered novel (see Semino 2008; Steen et al. 2010).”
Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues (2017, background): “This has led to novel empirical findings about patterns of metaphor use in relation to registers and word classes (Steen et al. 2010b), including the discovery of the importance of the distinction between direct and indirect metaphor in language use: their spectacularly different distribution…”
MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding (2021, methodology): “Inspired by the linguistic theories, MIP (Semino et al., 2007; Steen, 2010) and SPV (Wilks, 1975, 1978), Mao et al. (2019) proposed two detection models consisting of BiLSTM with attention mechanisms that relied on GloVe and ELMo embeddings.”