Competing on Good Politicians

By Vincenzo Galasso, T. Nannicini. American Political Science Review, 2009

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Is electoral competition good for political selection? To address this issue, we introduce a theoretical model where ideological parties select and allocate high-valence (experts) and low-valence (party loyalists) candidates into electoral districts. Voters care about a national policy (e.g., party ideology) and the valence of their district's candidates. High-valence candidates are more costly for the parties to recruit. We show that parties compete by selecting and allocating good politicians to the most contestable districts. Empirical evidence on Italian members of parliament confirms this prediction: politicians with higher ex ante quality, measured by years of schooling, previous market income, and local government experience, are more likely to run in contestable districts. Indeed, despite being different on average, politicians belonging to opposite political coalitions converge to high-quality levels in close electoral races. Furthermore, politicians elected in contestable districts have fewer absences in parliament, due to a selection effect more than to reelection incentives.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c339b686149538b0d5090d105f65d100e76f2125

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Beate Jochimsen
  2. Sebastian Thomasius
  3. Sergio Galletta
  4. Olle Folke
  5. Johanna Rickne
  6. Fernanda Brollo
  7. T. Nannicini
  8. Torsten Persson

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Beate Jochimsen
  2. Sebastian Thomasius
  3. Sergio Galletta
  4. Johanna Rickne
  5. Fernanda Brollo
  6. Olle Folke
  7. T. Nannicini
  8. Torsten Persson

Citations in the corpus