The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal

By Cameron Hepburn, Ella Adlen, J. Beddington, Emily A. Carter, Sabine Fuss, N. Mac Dowell, J. Minx, Pete Smith, Charlotte K. Williams. Nature, 2019

1,831 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c30552044b57969db70dea136c2fe75893bb9176

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Mark Z. Jacobson
2. Benjamin Sovacool
3. Henrik Lund
4. N. Stern
5. Cameron Hepburn
6. Brian Vad Mathiesen
7. Christian Breyer
8. R. Bergström

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Brian Vad Mathiesen
2. Henrik Lund
3. Vasilis Fthenakis
4. Marco Raugei
5. Benjamin Sovacool

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Christian Breyer
2. Brian Vad Mathiesen
3. Cameron Hepburn
4. Benjamin Sovacool
5. Marta Victoria
6. Henrik Lund
7. Mark Z. Jacobson
8. N. Stern

Citations in the corpus

• The CO2 reduction potential for the European industry via direct electrification of heat supply (power-to-heat) (2020, background): “The global renewable energy generation capacity has steadily increased and tapping into this vast energy source would help avoiding the caveats and risks of other options such as carbon capture and storage/utilisation (CCS/U) [10, 11], or carbon dioxide removal [10].”
• Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene (2021, neutral): “6% of the total anthropogenic emissions.(3)”
• On the History and Future of 100% Renewable Energy Systems Research (2022, background): “[114] C. Sapart, ‘‘CCU as a solution to mitigate climate change: State of the art and perspectives,’’ in Proc.”
• Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? (2020, background): “GGR technologies are necessary to meet the Paris goals, but barriers exist, and costs remain uncertain; more research, development and deployment could be extremely beneficial (Hepburn et al, 2019)”
• Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China (2021, background): “Prior studies on the role of the government in promoting corporate carbon reduction performance tended to focus on formal institution pressures, and numerous studies focused on the factors influencing emissions at the macro level (Dietz & Venmans, 2019; Hepburn et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020).”