The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity
By Romina Rader, Ignasi Bartomeus, J. Tylianakis, Etienne Laliberté. 2014
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2feb60376f432aa4508c69f1ffe26b4f3a8d99c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination (2015, unknown): “However, different pollinator taxa respond differently to disturbances (49, 50).”
- Landscape impacts on pollinator communities in temperate systems: evidence and knowledge gaps (2017, unknown): “However, Forrest et al. (2015) found no difference in bee body size between farmed and natural habitats and Rader et al. (2014) found that larger-bodied insect pollinators in New Zealand were more sensitive to intensive land use than smaller species.”
- The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature (2020, background): “…group and bee functional traits (e.g., body size, lecty, and sociality) influence various variables of interest, such as response to land-use change (Williams et al. 2010, Banaszak-Cibicka and _Zmihorski 2012, Rader et al. 2014) and pollination services (Brittain and Potts 2011, Munyuli 2014).”