A dual Craig-Bampton method for dynamic substructuring

By Daniel J. Rixen. 2004

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2fd36ad171677599b10acfee0ef027332608cf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Control and Systems Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Estimating relative eigenvalue errors in the Craig-Bampton method (2014, unknown): “[4–13]).”
Evaluation of Substructure Reduction Techniques with Fixed and Free Interfaces (2016, methodology): “Therefore, the approximation accuracy is improved [6].”
Generalized Methodology for Assembly and Reduction of Component Models for Dynamic Substructuring (2011, methodology): “former class is the Craig–Bampton method, while the MacNeal and Rubin methods ([5,6]), as well as the more recent dual Craig– Bampton (DCB) method [9], are examples of the latter class.”
Reduction of substructural interface degrees of freedom in flexibility‐based component mode synthesis (2007, methodology): “The first (see [18]) uses the classical method of Lagrange multipliers, leading to the use of the global flexibility to approximate the residual modes and the second [17] applies the localized Lagrange multiplier method, providing rather the local dynamic flexibility for the residual mode approximat”
On the use of modal derivatives for nonlinear model order reduction (2016, methodology): “Extension to Craig–Bampton methods For the simulation and control of the dynamics of elastic multibody systems [30], such as spacecraft structures, vehicles, robots, or biomechanical systems, model order reduction also plays an important role [9].”
Assessment of reduced models for the detection of modal interaction through rotor stator contacts (2010, background): “Among the variety of available component mode synthesis methods [11, 9, 12, 13], only those allowing for a direct treatment of the contact constraints in the reduced-order space should be considered.”
An iterative substructuring approach to the calculation of eigensolution and eigensensitivity (2011, methodology): “In most of the existing substructuring methods, only the lowest modes of the substructures are retained and the higher modes are removed for the efficiency [10-18].”