Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence

By T. Vogelmann, John R. Evans. 2002

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2face3073a6dc68e38a41ef60e67fc06ef6fe25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. U. Niinemets
2. W. Verhoef
3. Z. Malenovsky
4. Michele Meroni
5. L. Sack
6. Alexander Damm
7. C. Brodersen
8. Joanna Joiner

In Plant Science

1. U. Niinemets
2. L. Sack
3. Z. Malenovsky
4. C. Brodersen
5. W. Verhoef
6. Luis Guanter
7. Uwe Rascher
8. Michele Meroni

Citations in the corpus

• Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress. (2019, background): “, 2012), and of non-chlorophyll fluorophores and absorbers in leaf tissues (Bornman et al., 1991; Buschmann et al., 2000; Chappelle and Williams, 1987; Kalaji et al., 2012; Vogelmann and Evans, 2002).”
• Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. (2009, unknown): “These absolute values are somewhat greater than those obtained for blue light (2,600–2,900 m 2 mol –1 ) and green light (1,000–1,300 m 2 mol –1 ) in spinach leaves ( Vogelmann and Evans 2002 ).”
• Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. (2014, methodology): “…M arch 2019 First, red light penetrates deeper into the leaf and is more scattered than blue light (Agati, 1998; Buschmann and Lichtenthaler, 1998; Vogelmann and Evans, 2002), whereas green light may have an optical path up to five times longer than that of red or blue light due to weaker…”
• Structural determinants of leaf light-harvesting capacity and photosynthetic potentials (2006, background): “However, light capture will not increase linearly with T, as fewer photons penetrate to additional mesophyll layers ( Vogelmann and Evans 2002 ), and the amount of light intercepted per unit chlorophyll invested decreases as more chlorophyll is stacked within the leaf.”
• Do changes in light direction affect absorption profiles in leaves (2010, methodology): “diffuse light is likely due to the distribution of light, chloroplasts and Rubisco within leaves (Vogelmann and Evans 2002; Brodersen and Vogelmann 2007; Brodersen et al. 2008).”