Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design
By B. Robertson, David F. Radcliffe. Comput. Aided Des., 2009
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2e6e8e76a678d07c2b8fde62e2fb19eda4b0816
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Luis Arthur Vasconcelos
- J. Merrill
- Samantha Dedios
- W. Clifton
- Richard J. Jagacinski
- Nathan Crilly
- Christine Charyton
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges (2016, methodology): “…methods such as interviews, observations, diary techniques and other approaches to gain a better understanding of the real design situations that the experiments attempt to simulate (Crilly, 2015; also see Busby & Lloyd, 1999a; 1999b; Eckert, Stacey, & Earl, 2005; Robertson & Radcliffe, 2009).”
- Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers (2015, background): “…too many changes to the model, even if these changes would solve numerous problems or make other improvements such as reducing overall project risk’ (Robertson & Radcliffe, 2009: p. 137).22 Results from a follow up questionnaire study showed that designers seek to reduce this effect through the…”
- Assessing Creativity Specific to Engineering with the Revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment (2011, methodology): “While there is research to suggest that these tools may be usefully implemented (Gassmann & Zechky, 2008; Shneiderman, 2007), Robertson and Radcliffe (2009) found that there were both positive and negative effects to using CAD tools during the design process.”