Women's Use of Intimate Partner Violence against Men: Prevalence, Implications, and Consequences

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Illusion of Inclusion: The Failure of the Gender Paradigm to Account for Intimate Partner Violence in LGBT Relationships (2015, background): “By extension, this failure extends to the policy arena and makes explicit the necessity of understanding LGBT offenders and victims to craft policies that create effective treatment options (Goldenson, Spidel, Greaves, & Dutton, 2009; Hines & Douglas, 2009).”
“No one would ever believe me”: An exploration of the impact of intimate partner violence victimization on men. (2019, background): “…her own memory and beliefs (Gass & Nichols, 1988) and is something previously linked with women’s experiences of IPV (e.g. Guerin & de Oliveira Ortolan, 2017) Coker et al., 2002); IPV is a traumatic event and trauma increases risk of developing psychological disorders (Hines & Douglas, 2009).”
Partner violence against heterosexual and gay men: Prevalence and correlates (2012, background): “…is not necessarily representative, and is likely to characterize the more severe cases of IPV, and under represent male victims (Straus, 1990b), for whom there is more limited support, coupled with societal norms which discourage men from help-seeking (Addis & Mahalik, 2003; Hines & Douglas, 2009).”