How Should Public Pension Plans Invest
By Deborah Lucas, Stephen P. Zeldes. 2009
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2bd7fca487181ba5531b819883e7b269725fbf2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Robert Novy-Marx
- Joshua D. Rauh
- Murillo Campello
- Heitor Almeida
- Toni M. Whited
- Francesco A. Franzoni
- Philipp Krueger
- Nemit Shroff
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
- Robert Novy-Marx
- Joshua D. Rauh
- Philipp Krueger
- Juhani T. Linnainmaa
- Kewei Hou
- Lu Zhang
- Chen Xue
- Eugene F. Fama
Citations in the corpus
- Pension Fund Asset Allocation and Liability Discount Rates: Camouflage and Reckless Risk Taking by U.S. Public Plans? (2012, unknown): “As a result, Sundaresan and Zapatero (1997) and Lucas and Zeldes (2009) argue that the proportion of pension fund assets invested in risky assets should be positively related to the percentage of active participants, because pension benefits are tied to salaries, which are positively correlated…”
- Public Pension Promises: How Big are They and What are They Worth? (2011, background): “But if future taxation to meet pension promises has nonlinear distortionary costs, then investing public pensions in risky assets with high expected returns and high volatility may impose a large expected cost of distortionary taxation on future generations, as shown by Lucas and Zeldes (2009).”